Halo Reach Beta Forum
  • Subject: Would Like 10v10 Games?
Subject: Would Like 10v10 Games?

Were it so easy.

I think Invasion and maybe even generator defense (although, they would need to fix the current delay first) would benefit from a 10v10 version. Yes, 10v10, Reach is supposed to have much less lag than Halo 3 (I think it was like 40% less) and I'm sure it can certainly handle a 10v10 especially after the beta and once they fix it up even more.

  • 05.17.2010 3:44 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

Yes I do like halo. Yes I do like call of duty. Yes I do like battlefield.
Am I a traitor or what?

The bigger the better, only reason you should buy MAG

  • 05.17.2010 3:50 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

Formerly the righteous I Ross H I before the unfortunate e-mail change event

Posted by: marinemight
The bigger the better, only reason you should buy MAG

Resistance. 'Nuff said.

  • 05.17.2010 3:51 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

Legitimacy FTW! XD

Its gonna be hectiiiic.

  • 05.17.2010 3:52 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

Great idea, something that has never been done in a Halo game before; and I would imagine the Generator Defense would involve more than 3 generators in 10v10.

  • 05.17.2010 4:23 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

Were it so easy.

Posted by: Se7en Equ1nox
Great idea, something that has never been done in a Halo game before; and I would imagine the Generator Defense would involve more than 3 generators in 10v10.

Yeah, maybe or 5 since it would be more chaotic.

  • 05.20.2010 9:41 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Yea that wouldn't lag or anything.

  • 05.20.2010 9:49 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

I'd love 10 v 10. If what you said about the 40% less lag was true, push it up towards 15 v 15. Two flag heavy on a map the size of Bonyard + first person side seating in vehicles = most epic win to ever epically win.

I'm looking forward to BTB.

  • 05.20.2010 9:59 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

yes

  • 05.20.2010 10:54 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

Whats it to ya?

My voice may not be big but this sounds so Legit!!!

  • 05.20.2010 10:56 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

I believe it's 6 v 6 to represent the Noble 6. Also the generator defense which was played on a campaign map I guess was to test 6 player co-op. Well that's what I figure, could be wrong

  • 05.20.2010 11:18 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

You are a spartan. Your armor can deflect small arms fire, and can survive small explosions. Just remember to duck when you see a small, orange, plastic traffic cone going towards your face at a high velocity.

If the game doesn't lag up like crazy, like in Halo 3, I would be in favor of my players.

But as far as I can go, I'd rather have a good time with alot less lag, instead of a match with alot of people and lag everything up.

Lag times just kill the mood for me. :(

  • 05.20.2010 11:28 PM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas

Havoc

bump

  • 05.21.2010 1:09 AM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: LinkLegend0
I think Invasion and maybe even generator defense (although, they would need to fix the current delay first) would benefit from a 10v10 version. Yes, 10v10, Reach is supposed to have much less lag than Halo 3 (I think it was like 40% less) and I'm sure it can certainly handle a 10v10 especially after the beta and once they fix it up even more.



Generator Defense won't have more than 6 players to it. There's a reason why Invasion was 6v6 and Generator Defense was 3v3; Any films you saved of Generator Defense were labeled as "Overlook on <difficulty>", which is the same naming scheme that Campaign, Co-op, and Firefight films used.

Also, if they've been able to reduce lag by 40%, then that should mean Reach could support 26 players before it starts lagging like Halo 3 did.

  • 05.21.2010 1:44 AM PDT
  • reply edit unleash ninjas